An IEDD operator’s actions must be consistent with the threat assessment. There should not be any template applied as the ‘gold standard’. Templating will likely result in actions being conducted through a perception that they are mandatory, rather than based on need. For example, the degree to which an IEDD operator searches around a main charge before attaching H&L or placing a donor charge should be the absolute minimum to ensure safety. This means that on occasion the threat assessment will dictate that the main charge should be excavated 360 degrees around the sides and on other occasions there should only be the minimum amount exposed to conduct the actions required. IMAS 09.31 – WORKING PRACTICE APPROPRIATE IEDD TOOLS During each approach, an IEDD operator should carry suitable tools to deal with a range of scenarios.
Image 17. Image showing an IEDD operator prepared to conduct detonator safety. They have removed their gloves, prepared tape and placed a sharp scalpel-type folding knife at the ready. A sealable metal container will also be available and ready
This does not mean an IEDD operator should simply take over all the kit from the CP. Instead they should bring the tools that are appropriate for the plan that they have developed. This should be based on the ‘likely-case’ and ‘worse-case’ scenarios that they have assessed and planned against. Appropriate tools do not necessarily always mean energetic tools. IEDD tools should have been assessed through trials and testing as being suitable to meet the requirements for the task. For example, a commercially available H&L costing maybe $1000 will not necessarily be any better quality than an H&L kit procured locally, which can be much more easily maintained when parts need replacing.
ׁ HINT. Prior to leaving the CP, the IEDD operator should carefully plan what tools are required and how they will be used to execute the required procedure(s).
IEDD in mine action – overview
259
Powered by FlippingBook